Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: APRA capital rules ‘stifle’ lending, but what about Manipulation?

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 857
  • Print

APRA capital rules ‘stifle’ lending, says COBA

The Australian 12:00am May 15, 2019

Richard Gluyas


The prudential regulator’s capital rules for home loans discriminate against small banking institutions and put them at a major competitive disadvantage, according to a report commissioned by the $116 billion customer-owned banking sector.

The Pegasus Economics report, which concludes that the Financial System Inquiry’s 2014 warning about risks to competition in the banking sector have come to fruition, comes ahead of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s release of a draft revised capital framework for the industry.

Pegasus says the framework will have a “profound” impact on the level of competition in banking, particularly in the largest lending segment of residential mortgages.

Customer Owned Banking Association chief executive Michael Lawrence said yesterday that there was an acute need for a competitive and efficient home lending market.

“Following the financial services royal commission there’s a renewed focus on how regulators and government can improve competition in banking and ensure major banks are accountable without reducing financial stability,” Mr Lawrence said.

“The report shows that, due to APRA’s framework, the major banks enjoy a funding cost advantage in excess of $1000 annually on a residential mortgage of $400,000.

“The rules on risk weights mean there is too large a gap between the amount of capital that smaller banks must hold compared to the major banks.”

He said APRA should close the gap in risk weights to prevent the major banks “cream skimming” the lowest-risk home loans. By cream skimming, the major banks were leaving higher risk customers to rival lenders.

In 2015, APRA said it would raise average home-loan risk weights to 25 per cent for banks using sophisticated internal risk models, up from 16 per cent.

Pegasus says the risk weights initially rose, but two of the major banks — ANZ Bank and Commonwealth Bank — had “dramatically reduced” their risk weights on mortgages with the lowest risk of default.

“The average risk weights on such loans are now currently on average less than 6 per cent across the major banks,” it says.

The report suggests three ways to ensure that prudential regulation does not “stifle” competition in the banking system.

Competition considerations should be included in regulatory policy decisions through a statutory, secondary competition objective for APRA, and second, major banks should be required to hold more capital.

This would reduce the fragility of the financial system.

More detailed work was also required in the calculation of risk weights under the standardised approach for less sophisticated lenders.


Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 20 January 2021