GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
550776

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Banking royal commission casts doubt on regulator ASIC's enforceable undertakings

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 338
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Banking royal commission casts doubt on regulator ASIC's enforceable undertakings

ABC News17 May 2018

Dan Ziffer

 

Do the crime, but negotiate the time. Enforceable undertakings are a controversial Australian invention to punish corporate wrongdoers without regulators taking expensive court action.

The Commonwealth Bank recently copped two in just one month.

The nation's largest bank had to add $1 billion to its risk capital after a report into its grim culture, and was forced to pay out $25 million after the scandal of rigging the bank bill swap rate.

The agreements between a company and a regulator head-off lengthy and costly court action and are supposed to remedy problems in the financial sector.

But are the undertakings a copout?

Former federal treasurer Peter Costello told The Business how little he thinks of them as an enforcement tool.

"I'd like to hear ASIC explain to the royal commission why it works that way," he said.

"Why they thought it was better than actually taking legal action. Why they thought that would police behaviour better?"

ASIC was asked in the most recent hearings of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry about its undertakings.

Its response was not reassuring.

"To your knowledge," senior counsel assisting, Rowena Orr QC asked, "are enforceable undertakings with ASIC heavily negotiated?".

"Yes, they are," ASIC's Louise Macaulay replied.

The questioning went on.

"Is ASIC concerned about a public perception of ASIC negotiating and reaching consensus with financial services entities about appropriate sanctions for their misconduct?" Ms Orr asked.

"Yes, I'm aware of that public view," Ms Macaulay admitted.

'Deals done behind closed doors'

There is history. ASIC signed undertakings with the Commonwealth Bank and NAB in 2016 for rigging the foreign exchange market, and signed another one with AMP more than ten years ago for overcharging clients.

As the royal commission has highlighted, no-one took much notice.

Swinburne Law School corporate governance research fellow Helen Bird said there are concerns about "regulatory capture", where the enforcement agency is in thrall to the institutions it is meant to be watching over.

"From the viewpoint of the public, they appear to be deals done behind closed doors, between regulators and parties," she said.

"We don't see what goes on inside those rooms."

The number of enforceable undertakings has recently been sinking, from 22 five years ago to just seven in the most recent financial year.

ASIC is increasingly pursuing civil cases, and experts say that is because regulators are concerned about being seen as a soft touch.

'Punishment doesn't fit the crime'

Associate professor Andrew Godwin of Melbourne Law School said the undertakings are cost-effective when it comes to achieving compliance and enforcing the rules.

"But the question is whether it's significant in changing the mindset and changing the culture of institutions," he pondered.

"The public thinks the punishment doesn't fit the crime — and that's fitting when you see the huge profits the banks are making and the disproportionately low amounts they seem to be paying pursuant to these undertakings."

That gap was exposed when the Commonwealth Bank was forced to refund nearly $120 million it took from customers in the "fee-for-no-service" scandal detailed at the royal commission. The fine was just $3 million.

In February the bank reported a half-year cash profit of $4.73 billion.

In a statement, the regulator defended its decision.

"Bearing in mind the scale of the penalties imposed, the payments made to consumers affected and related circumstances, ASIC determined $3 million was an appropriate community benefit payment for ... CBA for their [fee-for-no-service] conduct as set out in their respective [undertakings]."

Fines mainly go to financial literacy programs

The $3 million goes to financial counselling and ethics organisations, and groups helping specific parts of the community, such as seniors.

Not-for-profit group Financial Literacy Australia (FLA) receives the majority of undertaking fines, using the money to teach consumers about finance.

In a sign of the cosiness within the banking industry, one board member of FLA is the Commonwealth Bank's Linda Elkins, who was grilled about the scandal that led to the $3 million fine, and forced to admit the bank was the "gold medallist" in fee-for-no-service claims.

Another FLA board member is Craig Dunn, who was AMP's chief executive between 2008 and 2013 when much of the fee-for-no-service conduct occurred, and who is currently a non-executive director of Westpac.

With a surprise $26 million cut for ASIC in the federal budget, the undertakings could be back in vogue.

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments