GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
591899

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Just how steep is the negative equity cliff?

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 132
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Just how steep is the negative equity cliff?

The Australian 12:00am April 16, 2019

James Kirby

 

As property prices continue to drop, a serious split has emerged over just how many people are facing negative equity — where their house price is lower than the value of their mortgage.

According to the Reserve Bank of Australia, it is just two borrowers in every hundred. But private researchers are generally pencilling in a figure closer to one in 10.

Negative equity is little known in Australia, where decades of rising house prices insulated the wider population from the corrosive effect of sliding prices. But a spike in numbers could quickly hit consumer spending and ultimately shares in banks and construction companies.

The alarming gap between private estimates and the RBA on the issue has prompted LF Economics founder Lindsay David to suggest the RBA figure — released last week as part of its regular financial stability review — is “fabricated”.

Lindsay says that even while the RBA is citing a figure of 2 per cent, in reality the number is heading above 10 per cent and that new instances occur every day. A 10 per cent figure would imply there are more than 400,000 borrowers in the distinctly uncomfortable position that if they sold their house they would still owe the bank money.

“A closer look at the figures is going to reveal a lot of people who bought at or near the peak are now facing this problem” Lindsay says.

Why, then, the huge discrepancy between the central bank and the rest of the market?

In October last year, a Roy Morgan survey put the number of borrowers facing negative equity at 386,000, about 9 per cent of borrowers.

“If house prices fall further the number of mortgage holders with no real equity will most likely increase,” the report said.

Lindsay says one of the key ­issues is that the RBA can read loan-to-valuation ratios as a cumulative figure, which can combine a family home (which does not have a mortgage) with a mortgaged investment property. Lindsay suggests this practice makes the leverage among many families look lower than it ­actually is.

“In other countries where we have seen negative equity hit 25 per cent, such as the US, they are looking at the figure on a property by property basis,” Lindsay says.

The RBA also aims to clarify the discrepancy in its own report by suggesting private research agencies are underestimating the prepayment of mortgages and the strong level of mortgage offset ­accounts.

Even allowing for the discrepancy with the private sector, the RBA figures also reveal one in 10 of those facing negative equity are on interest-only borrowing ­arrangements.

The RBA says that for interest-only borrowers, “the increase in repayments from moving to principal and interest may be difficult”.

It is the second time in a matter of days where the RBA has been left out on a limb in assessing the state of the residential property market.

In its latest report on high-rise apartment construction, released yesterday, National Australia Bank estimates a severe fall in construction volume is coming in the apartment market.

The NAB economic team says “the unwinding of the construction boom underpins our forecast that residential investment will fall by nearly 20 per cent by the end of 2020, almost double the decline anticipated by the Reserve Bank in February”.

As to where the negative equity effect will hit across the market, it is undoubtedly at its worst in Western Australia, where the residential market has been the weakest of the capital cities.

The RBA says 90 per cent of the negative equity situations faced to date have been either in Western Australia or the Northern Territory.

The RBA says “loans in negative equity are already more likely to be in arrears”.

“Having more borrowers in this scenario is distressing for the borrowers themselves and for the communities they live in,” it says.

“However, it is unlikely to represent a risk to broader financial stability, given it remains largely restricted to mining-exposed regions that represent a very small share of total mortgage debt.”

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments