Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Mad Mal thought bubbles: Coalition may limit number of properties investors can buy

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 355
  • Print

Coalition may limit number of properties investors can buy

Australian Financial Review Apr 18 2017 12:00 AM

Jacob Greber, Laura Tingle


The federal government has been examining ways to cap the value of tax breaks for housing investment as it continues to wrestle with the housing affordability issue.

While the government has firmly ruled out Labor's plan to dump negative gearing, and has downplayed the likelihood of lowering capital gains tax concessions, sources have told The Australian Financial Review the government has investigated the possibility of putting a limit on the number of properties that investors can buy.

An alternative approach may be to impose a dollar value limit on how much can be negatively geared by investors.

Questions around the preferred option hinge on how to find a measure that recognises large differences between property markets around the country and avoids generating new regional or price-bracket distortions.

"You have to find a way to make it uniform," one source said.

The government has been eager in recent days to hammer home the fact that relatively few Australians negatively gear a large portfolio of properties.

Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar said on Monday that 72 per cent own just one property, and 90 per cent own no more than two.

In other words, preventing negative gearing from the third property onwards may be consistent with Treasurer Scott Morrison's insistence that changes to the housing market be done in a way that is "surgical" rather than involving a "chainsaw".

A cap on tax treatments would also have the advantage of limiting the future cost to the budget of housing tax concessions, while avoiding a sharp collapse in prices, which Mr Morrison is keen to avoid.

Mr Sukkar on Monday accused Opposition Leader Bill Shorten of being motivated to dump all negative gearing in order to save $37 billion in the budget.

Housing continues to dominate the government's preparation for the May budget, with a deep internal split over whether to allow first-time buyers to access their superannuation savings to fund property deposits.

While Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has distanced himself from the idea, it continues to be flagged as part of a broader package to address housing affordability - sparking anger from within some parts of the Coalition who don't believe the government should be intervening in the market.

"You've got to wonder who was the brains trust that said the Turnbull government should make this budget all about housing affordability when it's an issue where, besides immigration and tax policy, the main policy levers rest with the states and the market," wrote Peta Credlin, former chief of staff to former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, over the long weekend.

Mr Abbott repeated over the weekend his insistence that scaling back immigration would help improve affordability.

Shadow minister for productivity Andrew Leigh scoffed at the Coalition's internal fights.

"They're far more concerned with fighting one another than they are with fighting for ordinary Australians," Mr Leigh said on Sky.

"Challenges like climate change, housing affordability, economic growth going by the wayside while the Liberal Party engages in these internal squabbles."



Last modified on
Rate this blog entry: