GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
771763

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: NAB's tips on how to snow ASIC - Fees for No Work Done Scam

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 697
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

NAB's tips on how to snow ASIC - Fees for No Work Done Scam

Australian Financial Review Aug 13 2018 7:07 PM

Karen Maley

 

Andrew Hagger, the chief customer officer for retail customers of National Australia Bank is an affable fellow with a formidable talent for circumlocution.

It was a knack that Melbourne-based bank used to great advantage back in October 2016.

Back then, the corporate watchdog, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, had sent out a draft report on advice service fees. The problem for NAB was that ASIC planned to include the bank's plan service fees – where customers in superannuation funds run by the bank had been charged fees on general education advice about superannuation and their investment options, even though they had no financial advisers linked to their account.

The draft copy of the report that ASIC prepared indicated that NAB was likely to face a compensation bill for fees for no service to around 120,000 clients was around $16.2 million – placing it, as one NAB executive put it, "in the middle of the pack" of bank poor behaviour.

The problem for NAB was that senior management in the bank's wealth division already knew that the bill for hitting some 220,000 clients with plan service fees – even though it was impossible for them to get this service – was going to be more like $34 million.

Complicating matters even more, the release of the ASIC report on fees for no service was likely to be released on around the same day as NAB announced its full-year profits. The risk was that NAB's success in lifting profits would be completely overshadowed by a furore over how the bank gouged fees from its clients. At the same time, there were fears that if the failed to disclose the full extent of its problem, ASIC might be critical.

But NAB had a secret weapon in the shape of Hagger. And on that critical weekend in late October 2016, NAB's chief executive, Andrew Thorburn, decided to make full use of Hagger's roundabout method of communication to putatively inform ASIC of the size of NAB's problem without actually giving the regulator any information.

On the following Monday, it was decided that Hagger would make a "proactive courtesy" call to ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer, and in an "open and transparent" manner inform him that NAB's plan service fee was likely to be somewhat higher than the $16.2 million mentioned in the ASIC draft report.

Hagger told the Hayne commission on Monday that the previous month he had had a discussion with Tanzer where he had indicated "in roundabout terms" about the extent of NAB's plan service fee issues.

"I remember saying to him, 'You have the number of members, and the approximate dollars involved in terms of the fees is similar, perhaps slightly bigger'" than in the first round of problems NAB had identified.

On the morning of Monday, 24 October, Hagger went into action again, calling up Tanzer and said that if ASIC was going to include plan service fees in its report, "I can advise that we are very close to a resolution. I don't want to front run and pre-empt the board discussions, but if you want to know – and that's probably the key point here – if you want to know anything further about any of this, let me know."

Counsel assisting, Michael Hodge, QC – who possesses an extremely precise intellect – was clearly impatient with this waffle. Why didn't the NAB simply come clean that it was up for some $34 million in compensation?

But Hagger stuck to his guns. Had Tanzer wanted further details about the amount of compensation NAB was up for, "I would have referred him to our earlier conversation, which is that they had the number of members and I had given him an indication of approximately what the dollar figure was.

"So, you know, as an accountant, I could have multiplied those two together. He was obviously capable of doing that."

But Hodge was not satisfied. Hadn't Hagger given ASIC the impression that things were up in the air, when in fact National Wealth Management had already resolved to approve the full remediation and to indemnify the trustee by the time he'd spoken to Tanzer. And was there any possibility that the NULIS trustee would decide on anything less than full remediation for its members?

Hagger, however, didn't budge. "What I felt it was appropriate for me to do, Mr Hodge, was to open the door as widely as I did, which is very wide," he replied.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Tuesday, 26 January 2021