Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Property Council PM’s dirty and dangerous FHB brain fart

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 780
  • Print

Property Council PM’s dirty and dangerous FHB brain fart

MacroBusiness 12:30 pm on May 14, 2019

David Llewellyn-Smith


Scummo revealed at Domain:

A $500 million plan to help first-home buyers into the market did not go through cabinet and has not been modelled for its impact on property prices, as experts warn the policy will struggle to meet its objectives.

The first some members of cabinet heard about the plan, which will see the government effectively guarantee a portion of loans taken out by first time buyers, was when Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced it during the Coalition’s election campaign launch on Sunday.

More at Banking Day:

Banking Day was told by several industry sources on Monday that the policy was slapped together by the coalition in the last week after the Housing Industry Association floated the idea to the caretaker government.

The policy, which has triggered a stream of concerns over responsible lending and the residual liability that taxpayers might wear for defaulting borrowers, took most consumer and industry groups by surprise.

The coalition appears to have consulted with no industry groups about the policy apart from the HIA – the peak body representing the construction and development sector.

So, the PM, a former researcher at the Property Council, hands out a great boondoggle at the 11th hour to his mates. This is corruption.

Moving into the policy itself, it works at cross-purposes, via Banking Day:

Putting to one side the merits of supporting small lenders, the scheme as it has been explained so far by the coalition seems to have been conceived with a cross-purpose: to support young homebuyers get a loan and also to bolster loan activity for second tier lenders.

The two objectives are not entirely compatible.

Not all small lenders offer competitive home loan rates and many sell mortgages that are more expensive than offers from ABA-member banks who were not consulted about the homebuyer support scheme.

There is a risk with a policy that preferences some lenders over others that borrowers could be enticed – in this case by the government – into mortgage products that might not be among the best deals available in the market.

The Coalition government and the Labor opposition need to explain why the scheme is going to be operate on a preferred lender model, rather than one that is borrower-directed.

But wait, there’s more, at the AFR:

While bankers said they were awaiting further detail, they said loans under the scheme could attract significantly higher capital charges compared to loans in which customers put down a larger deposit or took up lenders mortgage insurance.

If so-called mortgage risks weights were increased from 25 to 50 per cent on a $475,000 loan, a bank would need to charge up to 1 per cent more on a home loan in order to maintain the same return on equity.

Bankers however said different risk weight rules applied to loans with mortgage insurance for major banks as compared to regional lenders.

And more:

John Trowbridge, an insurance industry veteran who was a senior member of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, said the intervention would partly unwind the Howard government’s $108 million privatisation of the Housing Loans Insurance Corporation.

“This sounds like a government-run lender’s mortgage insurance vehicle, so that’s a surprise,” Mr Trowbridge said.

If the scheme does render the LMI business defunct, how are the existing LMI businesses, that guarantee some half a trillion in risky mortgages, going to grow their revenue bases to protect their equity? As such, their capital and even viability becomes an open question, threatening further higher costs to existing insured FHBs. Or are we just going to nationalise?

This is what happens when a desperate housing flunky somehow stumbles into a prime ministership.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 20 January 2021