Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Standard & Poor's class action to test limit for claims

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 384
  • Print

Standard & Poor's class action to test limit for claims

Australian Financial Review Mar 8 2018 11:00 PM

Jemima Whyte


A $250 million class action against Standard & Poor's ratings of risky financial products during the GFC is set to begin next Monday in the Federal Court of Australia and could pave the way for a wave of more claims.

This latest class action on behalf of local councils and other investors includes four claims and 13 separate products. It covers synthetic collaterised debt obligations (SCDO) products between 2006 and 2008 rated by S&P. It is unusual in that it is likely to be heard in court.

Last year, the Federal Court granted leave to investors in the class action to pursue a "tort of deceit claim" against S&P over the way it rated investments, arguing S&P intentionally tweaked its ratings methodology to rate products more highly. If successful, the tort of deceit claim means that class actions can be pursued until 2023.

"It's a significant case because it will determine what date noteholders could reasonably discover any deceit by Standard & Poor's in representing the rating of the product," said Squire Patton Boggs partner Amanda Banton, who is representing the investors.

"If the date [of the deceit being uncovered] is as late as last year, it potentially opens the way for more class actions in relation to the losses of the financial products of including corporate CDOS and RMBS CDOs."

Synthetic CDOs typically take exposure to the debt of about 100 companies – or residential mortgage backed securities (RMBs) – by purchasing insurance through the credit default swaps market. The premiums are then passed on to investors. But if a set number of companies default on their debt, the entire investment is declared worthless.

Duty of care

The global credit crisis and its aftermath led to many defaults of companies referenced by CDOs held by councils and other investors, with Australian councils and charity foundations losing hundreds of millions of dollars.

In addition to Standard & Poor's, ANZ is also being sued. The action cites ANZ's responsibilities as an AFSL licence holder, its duty of care and duties under the Code of Banking Practice.

Some of Squire Patton Boggs' previous actions were funded by IFM Bentham, but this one will be funded by Singaporean funder Litigation Capital Partners. Clifford Chance is representing S&P. Eight weeks has been set aside to hear the case.

In 2016, S&P settled a multimillion-dollar class action brought by around 90 councils, churches and charities who invested in the products; delivering litigation funder IMF Bentham an almost $50 million profit boost.

Class actions are increasing, though the vast majority settle out of court.


The Australian Law Reform Commission is conducting a federal inquiry into litigation funding, spurred by the increased incidence of class actions. A discussion paper is due by the end of May.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry: