Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Unspent billions shifted from the books of NDIS agency

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 591
  • Print

Unspent billions shifted from the books of NDIS agency

The Australian 12:00am March 30, 2019

Rick Morton


EXCLUSIVE  A multi-billion-dollar underspend by the National Disability ­Insur­ance Scheme would once have sat on the books of the independent agency running the program­ but now sits with the governing depart­ment after a change of rules.

In the final budget outcome for 2017-18, the underspend for the scheme — due to delays in reaching targets and participants spending between 60 and 70 per cent of their allocated support — was $2.5 billion but that figure has now climbed dramatically as problems persist.

National Disability Insurance Agency deputy chief executive Vicki Rundle told The Weekend Australian she “could never guarantee­” what any government would do with the money.

“Governments, of course, year-on-year, will look at expenditure and I could never guarantee to you in any year what a government would do,” she said. “It (scheme funds) used to be our approp­riation but scheme funds are now a Department of Social Services ­appropriation.”

This technicality, which essent­ially makes the department the postbox for NDIA money currentl­y worth about $18bn, makes it easier for a government to obscure how much money has not yet been spent.

It is this money that contributes to a predicted surplus in next week’s budget.

Ms Rundle said the agency still had access to the funds, if it ­chooses to use it to invest in the scheme.

“We’ve had a budget underspend since inception,” she said. “Our money, year-on-year, has been available. It has never been an issue for us.”

Social Services Minister Paul Fletcher is expected to announce today a decision by the NDIA board to boost pay and hourly rates for some providers under the scheme after Scott Morrison demande­d action to placate a new campaign from vocal businesses.

The plan, first revealed in The Australian on Wednesday, would cut into the underspend by about $500 million but still leave the ­Coalition with billions of dollars to prop up the budget.

When asked if the NDIA could handle the ongoing costs of a boost to provider payments, Ms Rundle said: “We can, now.

“We need to set a price that we think gives providers the ­capacity to make a margin without price gouging — we want to make sure we do not put participants at risk.”


Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Sunday, 29 November 2020