Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Westpac defends lending habits - allegedly breaking lending laws more than 260,000 times.

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 489
  • Print

Westpac defends lending habits

The Australian 12:00am May 8, 2019

Anthony Klan


Westpac has criticised the corporate regulator’s enforcement of responsible lending laws as a “new idea” and says its wronged borrowers could make lifestyle changes to meet repayments in its defence of allegedly breaking lending laws more than 260,000 times.

Fronting the second day of hearings in the Federal Court in Sydney, lawyers for Westpac said the bank had “done its utmost to meet its legal requirements” and that it was not in the bank’s interests to make loans to borrowers who could not afford them.

The Australian Securities & Investments Commission has claimed Westpac engaged in a “systemic approach” of ignoring the living expenses that borrowers declared when applying for loans 261,987 times between December 2011 and March 2015.

ASIC and Westpac had agreed the bank would pay a $35 million penalty, however last November the Federal Court refused to allow the deal to proceed on the grounds the parties had not stated how many times responsible lending laws were broken, or the ways in which they were broken.

The Federal Court is required to give approval to such deals.

Westpac’s lawyers said ASIC’s “mechanistic approach to legislation” was a “new idea” and the bank had adequate hardship provisions for customers who could not afford to repay their loans.

The bank argued that default rates on the loans it wrote were low and where calculations were made that understated a person’s living expenses, people “could take reasonable changes” to their lifestyles to avoid defaulting on loan repayments.

“We consider whether repayments will cause significant hardship” the bank’s lawyers said.

The court’s rejection of the $35m settlement last November meant either ASIC had to drop the case or Westpac and ASIC had to litigate the case before the court, which is occurring now.

The court heard yesterday that of the 261,987 cases of improper lending, in 154,351 cases Westpac had also failed to use correct figures when assessing borrowers taking out “interest only” loans. The bank failed to account for the increase in payments when loan repayments reverted from being the interest-only component, to being repayments of both the principal and the interest, typically between two and five years after a loan was written.

ASIC has told the Federal Court that despite borrowers typically being required to provide highly ­detailed information about their financial position when making a loan application — ­including stating their income, expenses, assets and liabilities — Westpac would systematically ­ignore that information.

The corporate regulator said Westpac had instead used broad expense averages, or “benchmarks”. Those benchmarks were not even tied to a borrower’s postcode but to the entire city in which they lived, the court has heard.

ASIC said using that household expenditure measure (HEM) approach was improper because it failed to take into ­account the borrower’s individual circumstances.

The hearings continue.



Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 02 December 2020