GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
769520

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

COMMONWEALTH BANK FORCES LITTLE OLD PENSIONER TO SELL FAMILY HOME. BANK ENTRAPMENT.

Posted by on in From My Window
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 3184
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

0 0 0

Senate inquiry into Banking:

 

The Commonwealth Bank, which makes a profit of $7 BILLION per year, (YES! BILLION!), which is AFTER obscene amounts of money have been paid to Ralph Norris, Ian Narev, all the Board Members, all the Bank Executives and the expenses and office accommodation and all these, and staff wages & costs, then the Bank forces little old pensioners like me to sell their family home, over which the Bank has a Mortgage, and which the Bank is trying to force me to sell because of the bank’s entrapment, and deceptive, misleading, unconscionable, unethical and immoral conduct and maladministration in lending. The Real Estate Market is presently kept afloat mainly by sales which are “forced” by the banks.

 

The bank’s practices of encouraging low documentation loans are “entrapment”, should not be allowed/should never have been allowed.

 

Then look at how they sell up the homes of ordinary Australians!!!.

 

Signed:         Michele Fay Date: 31st May 2012STATEMENT BY MICHELE FAY -v- COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

 

CBA Bank Financial and Lending advisors (9 in all) were: , Coolangatta Branch

, Financial and Lending Officer, Tweed Heads. , Financial & Lending Officer, Coolangatta Branch , Coolangatta Branch

, South Tweed Heads Branch, Financial and Lending Officer, who would often call in to see me – I now realise this was usually when my loan funds were running out! Female Manager at Coolangatta Branch Female Manager at Southport Branch

, Coolangatta Branch. There were others from time to time and some call centre people as well, (all unknown).

 

All the above-named people, as bank employees - and the Commonwealth Bank itself - should be named and shamed!

 

In 2003 I was dealing with        , Tweed Heads Branch of Commonwealth Bank, on a “normal housing type loan”. I applied for a loan of $60,000.00, based on my income, which was a Centrelink benefit, and my home security (unencumbered at that time!!), That loan was approved so I could buy a car, to be able to try to get a job, & to get to a job, and to fix the leaking bathrooms in my 25 year old home. I then lived, as I do now, in my home in a small Village. A car is an absolute necessity to get from my home to any job, or even to Woolworths/Coles/shops/shopping centres/doctors/dentists. .

Because of my age, my residential location, my times out of the work-force, firstly as a single mother with two children, then as a daughter/part time carer of a widowed mother with dementia, as well as the situation with the world & local economy at that time, I was not able to get a job.

In 2004, it appeared to me that the only way to make a living and supplement my Centrelink benefit was to work for myself. As a Licensed Real Estate Agent, I then took a 5 year lease on a small, inexpensive shop/office, and for some very short time I made a meagre living which, with my Centrelink benefit, allowed me to barely survive financially. Then, contrary to the initial advice from Centrelink, my Centrelink benefit was cancelled, as Centrelink ruled that as I was working, I was not eligible for that benefit.

That loss of income, combined with the previous loan money from the Bank which had supported me initially, and was running out, gave me more financial difficulties, and caused me to contact the Bank again. I explained that I was not making money, and was in financial difficulties. The Bank’s response and advice was to increase my borrowings. I again said I was not making money, and had neither the income nor tax figures to support any repayments. At this stage, in approximately 2004 (I think) I dealt with   , and some others, mainly at Coolangatta Branch. My financial difficulties & problems began in approximately 2003/2004.

 

I approached the Bank staff, whose answer was “you have assets – we advise you to - and we will - re-write the loan”. I now know this is called asset lending and entrapment!!

The next episode in this sad, sorry, saga was in approximately 2004/2005 when I again consulted with the Bank about my low income and my inability to make repayments on the existing loan. To meet the shortfall and make repayments, more borrowings were advised, recommended & organised by the Bank.

About this time I was approached by    , South Tweed Heads Branch, who came to my office and who advised on, recommended and re-organised my loans. I recall her saying that as I had a very low income, but had an ABN; the best thing for me was to do a low-doc loan. I had never heard of this type of loan before. I now know the securities were “changed around”, and my family home of then 25 years (now 30 years), was called “investment property” and the bush block/horse paddock which I had purchased in 1996 was called “home loan”. It appears to me now that this should not have been done.

 

The Bank’s treatment of my affairs and finances and its advice to me and its lending practices were entrapment, deceptive and misleading, unconscionable, unethical, unprofessional, untrustworthy and immoral.

 

I recall that I said to         that I had no money to make repayments, and no tax figures to support repayments. advised me that it did not matter; as the repayments

would come out of the loan funds. She said: “It does not matter, as you have the assets for security”, and “You know, you can always rely on the Bank looking after its customers”. At a later stage, she said to me: “the Bank requires you to take out & pay for Mortgage Insurance, to protect against any possible default”. That did seem logical, but I was as never at any time told Mortgage Insurance only protected the Bank, but not me. I have now been advised that the insurer would pay the bank any shortfall, but that the insurer would then “come after me for the difference.”         did not refer to “Lender’s Mortgage Insurance”, which I am now told it is, she only called it “Mortgage Insurance”. This is how it is still referred to by the Bank & by FOS.

I recall that on one (of several) occasion, when         again called in to my office, mentioning to     that my daughter was getting married in London in 2007, but that I could not go to my daughter’s wedding as I could not afford to go.

said: “I can arrange funds for you, so you can go”.

Naturally, it broke my heart to not be able to go to my only daughter’s wedding. My daughter would have understood, and would not have minded at all! However, her father was going,

 

her brother was going and I could not afford to go, and had I not had funds increased by the bank, I would not have gone!

arranged more loan funds, all the paperwork, and the Valuations, and I went with my son to London for my daughter’s Wedding (naturally flying economy class).

At no time did any one of all the Bank’s Financial and Lending EXPERTS!! suggest I consult a solicitor or accountant before taking out these loans. The Bank & FOS are now telling me to consult a solicitor & financial consultants!!! I consider the Bank’s practices predatory, and entrapment. I honestly and truthfully told each and every one of the Bank’s Financial and Lending personnel about my low income. I also did not see the GFC coming! However, I am sure the Bank did!!!

All of the applications for the loans were filled in on computers, by the lending officers on each particular occasion. I was just given some forms to sign. In my day, one would sit down with a Bank Manager, and he would carefully go through with you the proposed loans and repayment amounts. appears to me that now Finance and Lending personnel are computer literate numbers people - which I am not – and are only interested in writing up loans to meet their set targets, and most likely, (clearly) receive bonuses on results written. It also now appears to me bank personnel are paid bonuses on loans called in and assets sold. It also is clear that banking staff lied & incorrectly filled in amounts on these forms!! It is now clear to me that all the Bank’s practices were, and are against the Code of Banking Practice, and that it is also against the Code of Banking Practice to rely on asset realisation to finance and/or repay loans.

 

I now realise that I should not have - and given the right advice, would not have - taken out loans of this magnitude. I now believe the bank’s Financial Advisors and Lending Officers were looking to meet targets and achieve bonuses, and that the Bank was relying on asset realisation to finance repayment, as I never did have sufficient income for repayments.

 

 

The “two overseas trips” referred to by FOS, where I did use some of the loan moneys advanced – totalling only $10,000.00 - were because of my daughter’s wedding, but mainly for her care after the tragic car accident, both of which trips any mother would take in the circumstances.

Clearly I sold my soul to the Devil (the Commonwealth Bank!) as any mother would!!!

 

In July 2009 I applied for and received a Centrelink benefit, which was $456 per fortnight and which I received until I turned 64, when I was then eligible for the age pension which was slightly higher. I now have casual work, of approximately 12 hours per week, and receive a

part pension of approximately $300.00 per week.

About this time, 2009, I again contacted the bank on a number of occasions and was referred to the “Customer Service” call centre. I again explained my financial difficulties, but the call centre people did not/could not comprehend/would not give adequate advice relating to my situation, and over the next six to twelve months or so, I was told a number of different things by the call centre people, and Customer Service Centre people. I was completely unfamiliar with, and confused by, the Bank’s processes in these situations. I advised I was trying to sell my home, but that there was “no real estate market” because of the GFC. I am sure the Bank has records on

file of these contacts, calls, issues, my letters, and dates.

 

 

I was eventually, and on numerous occasions, contacted phone by         from Commonwealth Bank “Customer Service”. I was not given customer service; harassed and bullied, & threatened with the forced sale of my home.

He said: “We will give you three months to sell the property and repay the loan, if you sign an agreement to give us the keys to your house”! He said: “You will not get a better offer than this, and we will arrange a Valuation to give you that time”. He said: “We are concerned that the debt will become unmanageable” (The debt was always unmanageable!) I said: “Who would do that Valuation?”, as I know that Valuers appointed by Bank’s know when a sale is being forced!

 

He said: “Whoever the Bank appoints”. On another occasion, he mentioned CBRE, and I said: “That would be a conflict of interest, as they are also Real Estate Agents, and the Real Estate section and the Valuation section would then jointly know the issues about why a Valuation is being done.”

My concerns and my comments were completely disregarded - I was then, at least three times, contacted by CBRE just prior to Christmas. They advised that they had been instructed by the Bank to do a Valuation of my home, and requested - in fact demanded - a date and time to do the Valuation. I refused.

 

I was then again contacted by      , and bullied and harassed, and threatened with a forced sale of my home.

He then said: “We will give you six months to sell your home, if you sign an Agreement to give us the keys to your house.” He said: “I have really tried hard and managed to get you the six months to sell, instead of three, and that is the best offer you will get”. I then advised him I could not take any more of the threating, harassing and bullying phone calls, particularly while I was at work, with other staff and my employer close by. Naturally, I was most upset & in tears on

these occasions, and because of this treatment by the Bank.

 

The worst two of phone calls from and on 21 October 2010, at 8am, when         continued on at me for approximately half-an-hour, with the same tactics as previously described.

On another occasion, said “There is no way I will agree to this matter going to the Financial Ombudsman’s Service, and in any event that Service will not deal with it!”

 

Eventually, I found/received information regarding the Financial Ombudsman’s Service where I could lodge a dispute, and how, which I did. This was approximately some six to seven years after I first approached the Bank regarding my financial difficulties! My difficulties were from 2003/2004 to 2009/2010, which is when I lodged my dispute with FOS. (After six or seven years of getting no-where with the Bank!!)

 

My home of 30 years is in a very, very, very small Village. My nearest town is 20 minutes away, by car, (no public transport), on a hilly and winding road. This is why, in 2003 (9 years ago), I applied to Commonwealth Bank for a loan of $60,000, to buy a car, so I could get a job, and to do urgently needed repairs to my home. My home at that time was unencumbered. I foolishly trusted the Bank!!

 

The findings by the Financial Ombudsman’s Service are:

9 cases of maladministration by Commonwealth Bank in 9 years!!!

Signed:

Michele Fay 29/05/2012

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 18 October 2012

    Specifically, does AUS have an "Anti~Terrorism Taskforce" as bankster behaviour clearly constitutes "DOMESTIC TERRORISM"!!!

Leave your comment

Guest Monday, 18 January 2021